Impartiality: A critical review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20856/jnicec.5005Keywords:
Impartiality, Transparency, Ethics, Professionalism, Career guidanceAbstract
This article (re)opens debate about the concept of ‘impartiality’ in career guidance. It argues that while the concept of impartiality is at the centre of professional ethics for career guidance in the UK, it is poorly defined and weakly theorised. Through a process of concept mapping and an exploration of the challenges associated with impartiality, the article clarifies the definition of impartiality and problematises its centrality in the UK’s ethical frameworks. The article argues that there are three main ideas which constitute the contemporary notion of impartiality: institutional independence, outcome neutrality and political neutrality. It argues that the grouping of these three ideas under a single term is unhelpful as they all raise different issues and objections. The article then outlines five challenges: ambiguity; application in practice; alignment with career theory, tensions with other ethical values; and practicing within partial funding regimes. Finally, some ways forward are suggested.
References
Association of Graduate Careers Advisory Services (AGCAS). (n.d.a). AGCAS code of ethics.
https://www.agcas.org.uk/AGCAS-Member-Code-of-Ethics
Association of Graduate Careers Advisory Services (AGCAS). (n.d.b). AGCAS position on impartiality and the promotion of particular employers and industry sectors.
Canadian Career Development Foundation. (2021). Code of ethics for career development professionals. CCDF. https://ccdp-pcdc.ca/en/pdf/Code_of_Ethics_2021_EN.pdf
Career Development Association of New Zealand. (n.d.). Code of ethics.
https://cdanz.org.nz/ModularPage?Action=View&ModularPage_id=26
Career Development Institute (CDI). (2018). Career Development Institute code of ethics.
https://www.thecdi.net/write/Documents/Code_of_Ethics_update_2018-web.pdf
Career Industry Council of Australia (CICA). Code of ethics for Australian career development professionals. https://www.cdaa.org.au/common/Uploaded%20files/MemberResources/Code%20of%20Ethics/Code%20of%20Ethics%20Australian%20Career%20Development%20Professionals%20March%202019.pdf
Colley, H. (2011). ‘Ethics work’ in career guidance: navigating ethical principles and ethical pressures in an under-resourced service. Journal of the National Institute for Career Education and Counselling, 26, 15-21. https://doi.org/10.20856/jnicec.2604
Colley, H., Chadderton, C. & Lewin, C. (2010) Changing career guidance practice in Connexions: A question of ethics? Career Guidance Today, 18(3), 33-37.
Education Act (2011). C.21, part 4. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/21/part/4/crossheading/careers-education-and-guidance
Department for Education. (2023). Careers guidance and access for education and training providers. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1103188/Careers_statutory_guidance_September_2022.pdf
De Vos, A., & Soens, N. (2008). Protean attitude and career success: The mediating role of self-management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), 449-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.08.007
Evans, N. (2021). Raising aspirations and impartiality: A paradoxical position for career guidance professionals? University of Sunderland. https://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/13932/1/13932.pdf
Green, F. (2022). Birkbeck, University of London becomes first higher education institution to adopt Fossil Free Careers. Career Guidance for Social Justice Blog. https://careerguidancesocialjustice.wordpress.com/2022/10/13/birkbeck-university-oflondon-becomes-first-higher-education-institution-to-adopt-fossil-free-careers/
Institute of Guidance Counsellors. (2012). Code of ethics of the Institute of Guidance Counsellors.
https://igc.ie/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/code-of-ethics.pdf
Hooley, T. (2022). Building a radical career imaginary: using Laclau and Mouffe and Hardt and Negri to reflexively re-read Ali and Graham’s counselling approach to career guidance. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 50(4), 660-675. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2022.2058697
International Association for Educational and Vocational Guidance. (2017). IAEVG ethical guidelines. https://iaevg.com/Ethical-guidelines
Irving, B. A., & Malik-Liévano, B. (2019). Ecojustice, equity and ethics: challenges for educational and career guidance. Revista Fuentes, 21(2), 253-263. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2019.v21.i2.09
Kreutzer, F., & Luga, A. E. (2016). A European career guidance concept for international youth mobility. W. Bertelsmann Verlag.
Laclau, E. (1996/2007). Emancipation(s). Verso.
National Career Development Association (NCDA). (2015). NCDA code of ethics. https://www.ncda.org/aws/NCDA/asset_manager/get_file/3395?ver=738700
Payne, J. & Edwards, R. (1997). Impartiality in pre-entry guidance for adults in further education colleges. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 25(3), 361-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069889708253814
Rogers, C.R. (1942). Counseling and psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
Rogers, C.R. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Houghton Mifflin.
Rogers, C.R. (1961). On becoming a person. Houghton Mifflin.
Select Committee on Social Mobility. (2016). Overlooked and left behind: improving the transition from school to work for the majority of young people. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201516/ldselect/ldsocmob/120/12002.htm
Schiersmann, C., Ertelt, B.J., Katsarov, J., Mulvey, R., Reid, H. & Weber, P. (2012). Handbook for the academic training of career guidance and counselling professionals. Network for Innovation in Career Guidance and Counselling in Europe (NICE).
Schulz, W. (2021). Ethical principles and decision making for career counsellors. In M.Scharpf, & A. Frey (Eds.). Vom Individuum her denken [Think in terms of the individual] (pp.21-28). wbv.
Spong, S.J. (2007). Ideas of influence: counsellors’ talk about influencing clients. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 35(3), 331-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880701418771
Sultana, R. G. (2017). Career guidance in multicultural societies: Identity, alterity, epiphanies and pitfalls. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 45(5), 451-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2017.1348486
Watermeyer, R., Morton, P., & Collins, J. (2016). Rationalising for and against a policy of school-led careers guidance in STEM in the UK: A teacher perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1441-1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1195520
Watts, A. G. (1996). Socio-political ideologies in guidance. In Watts, A.G., B. Law, J.Killeen, J.M. Kidd, & R. Hawthorn. (Eds.) Rethinking careers education and guidance (pp.233-241). Routledge.
Webb, C. (2022). Blurred lines: What makes an ‘ethical’ careers policy? Career Guidance for Social Justice Blog. https://careerguidancesocialjustice.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/blurred-lines-what-makes-an-ethical-careers-policy/
Zelloth, H. (2014). Career guidance for Vocational Education and Training (VET). Journal of the National Institute for Career Education and Counselling, 33(1), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.20856/jnicec.3308
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 1. In submitting an article, the Author hereby grants to NICEC the exclusive first publication right to the paper submitted by him / her for inclusion in the publication named above and the non-exclusive rights thereafter to publish and authorise the publication of all articles and all parts, adaptations and abridgements thereof in all forms and media throughout the world. 2. In consideration for the above grant of rights, and subject to delivery of acceptable material, NICEC hereby undertakes to prepare for publication and publish the paper unless prevented by circumstances beyond its control. 3. The Author agrees that NICEC may make minor changes to areas such as formatting, spelling, referencing, layout or punctuation, to ensure quality and uniformity of style. 4. NICEC agrees that the Author may share the final published PDF of their article (e.g. publication to the Author’s web profile, or institutional repository). 5. The Author warrants to NICEC that in respect of the paper submitted: (i) it does not infringe any existing copyright or licence; (ii) except where the Author, at the time of submission of the paper, notifies NICEC, the paper is original; (iii) the Author has the full power to make this assignment and that this assignment does not infringe the rights or licence of any other person, and that where there a co-author, the co-author also fully agrees to the terms in this document; (iv) the paper contains nothing defamatory or otherwise unlawful and no information has been obtained in contravention of legislation currently in force (v) submission of the paper demonstrates acceptance of all these conditions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.